Labels

Showing posts with label Piya Tan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Piya Tan. Show all posts

Tuesday, 15 August 2023

A Reflections by Piya Tan. GOOD KING YAMA A reflection on the Deva,dūta Sutta (M 130), SD 2.23

A Reflections by Piya Tan.
GOOD KING YAMA
A reflection on the Deva,dūta Sutta (M 130), SD 2.23


King Yama (yama,rāja), in early Buddhism, does neither rules the hells nor “assigns the wicked to the appropriate hell” (as wrongly stated in the Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism), which will clearly be against the natural law of karma. The key sutta or locus classicus for the king Yama myth is in the Deva,dūta Sutta (M 130) and the shorter (Yama) Deva,dūta Sutta (A 3.35), SD 48.10. 

At the start of the Deva,dūta Sutta, the Buddha states that he has direct knowledge of rebirth, that is, he has himself witnessed how being painfully “fare according to their karma.” The habitually good are reborn among the gods or humans while the habitually bad fall into the subhuman realms of pretas (ghosts), animals or hell-beings. [§§1-3]


INVESTIGATOR


There is no day or night in hell, so king Yama all the time must interview every hell-being—those who disrespected parents, abused good holy men, held wrong views (including wrong views about Buddhism) and practised these wrong views (rituals and vows, etc).

Yama asks each of them: 

(1) How you not seen a helpless INFANT lying in its own filth?

(2) How you not seen an OLD MAN OR WOMAN?

(3) Have you not seen a SICK MAN OR WOMAN?

(4) Have you not seen a CRIMINAL BEING PUNISHED AND TORTURED?

(5) Have you not seen a DEAD MAN OR WOMAN?

Did it not occur to you that you will be like them? That you should do good to avoid do that you will not suffer their painful fruits?

All the hell-beings reply that they were NEGLIGENT (careless and unmindful). [§§4-8]


YAMA IS DISGUSTED WITH THEM


Imagine king Yama having to ask the same question to every one of these hell-beings. 

Imagine how hell-beings there are. About 151,600 people die every day, that is, about 6,3116 people every hour, or 105 every minute! Not a very interesting job, indeed!

After seeing so many hell-beings, asking the same questions and hearing the same silly answers, Yama must clearly be disheartened, even disgusted and tired of the situation. Not surprisingly, he makes an interesting aspiration.

Yama, himself realizing the dangers that await all unawakened beings, aspired to be reborn a human in the time of the Buddha, to meet him and renounce under him. That way, he will free himself from suffering. 

[§§28-29]. Imagine working in hell all our life, and doing the same thing every few minutes! That is really hell!

Hence, in the early Buddhist mythology of king Yama, we see an almost human Yama. 

He himself learns of the dangers of samsara, After all even the role of Māra is impermanent, and he too can change and awaken to true reality, although he will take much longer than most of us.

This is called "THE YAMA EFFECT," that is, a feeling of nausea and flight reflex on account of facing the same ideas or attitudes repeatedly.


CHINESE HELLS


When the Yama myth reached China, it underwent a Chinese conversion. The Chinese theologians took Yama literally as the “judge” of the dead. Chinese Buddhism shaped the Buddhisms of east Asia (Korea, Japan, Vietnam), which followed the same story. 

In the Chinese Buddhist Sutras, Yama, called Yánmó Wáng (閻摩王) or Yánluó Wáng (閻羅王). He interrogates the hell-beings about their deeds, and assigns them to the appropriate form of punishment. In fact, his role was expanded in Chinese Buddhism, where he oversaw an essentially Chinese infernal bureaucracy.

Yama, in Chinese Buddhism, is said to have organized the complex structure of “earth prisons” (地獄 dìyù; Skt naraka) into a streamlined system of 10 infernal courts, each presided over by its own king (also called Yama) who would judge hell-beings who have come before him. These infernal judges are known as the “10 kings of hell” (十王 shí wáng), as described in the Shíwáng jīng (十王經), an apocryphal Chinese sutra.

In imperial China, as on earth, so in hell.

This is called 'THE YENLUO EFFECT," the use of terror effects and ethical conditionings for social control of the masses. In China, this is the hell myth and Confucianism, by which the imperial system and the upper elite control those below them.



fb180809 piya


17 August 2023




Saturday, 29 April 2023

THE VESAK OF OUR LIFE

THE VESAK OF OUR LIFE


As Vesak Day approaches, I want to joyfully reflect on the dedication a very small but remarkable group of local Buddhists whom I have known for some years now. The reasons for our friendship are very simple. We are local Buddhists who do not depend on foreign missionaries (we respect them and want them to be good monastics). We are inspired by good local monks and local Dharma teachers who share the same vision: we all aspire to become streamwinners in this life.

During one of my sutta talks with this group of Sotāpanna aspirants, I asked how of those assembled (more than 20 of them) actually aspire to streamwinning in this life itself: they ALL put up their hands enthusiastically! Sadhu! May the sāsana prosper in our lands!

This wonderful community of “streamers” (short form for sotāpanna aspirants) grew naturally after over 20 years of learning the Dharma and suttas. All of us have been to the largest foreign mission temples here. We faithfully learned Buddhism, but we are only taught to “transfer” merits, donate for buildings and send millions to the home countries of these missionaries. We raise funds for monks to pursue university careers and build their own comfortable home viharas here and overseas. 

All this time, sadly, we were not really taught the suttas and the true purpose of the Buddha’s teachings. 

That is, until local monks and lay Dharma teachers dedicated with love for the suttas, discovered that we can be streamwinners in this life itself (See Saṁyutta chapter 25, S 25.1-10 @ SD 16.7). We are so happy at this discovery that we simply gravitated together like devas to the Bodhi tree with the radiant Buddha sitting under it, and feel so close to the Buddha and awakening.

Doing dana alone may only make us reborn as loving pets of others because we do not keep the precepts and lack wisdom (see the Saddha Jānussoṇi Sutta, A 10.177 @ SD 2.6a). 

Practising wholesome dana (such as not giving money to monastics), keeping the precepts (and encouraging monastics to keep their rules, too) and learning the suttas (and sharing it) helps us cultivate the mind in calm and insight – all this helps our aspiration to become streamers in this life. This is guaranteed! See the Anicca Cakkhu Sutta (S 25.1), SD 16.7.

We only need to constantly and wholesomely reflect on IMPERMANENCE. Everything that exist is impermanent; our possessions are impermanent; our loved ones are impermanent; we are impermanent. 

Even this breath – coming in, going out – is impermanent. Reflect in this way, says the Anicca Cakkhu Sutta, then, we will surely attain streamwinning in this life itself. Sadhu!

Vesak is a day of giving, a precept (uposatha) day, the day to remember the Buddha, his awakening and his passing away (impermanence). Make Vesak the most important and historical day.

Transform our life this very day: aspire to STREAMWINNING. Then, see how clear and simple the Dharma is, and how easy meditation becomes because our heart is in the right place and our eyes looking in the right direction – to the Buddha’s path of awakening.


Make this the Vesak of our life: 

Join us in renewing our aspiration to STREAMWINNING in this life itself.

Saddha Jāṇussoṇi Sutta (A 10.177):

http://dharmafarer.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2.6a-Saddha-Janussoni-S-a10.177-piya.pdf. 

Anicca Cakkhu Sutta (S 25.1):

http://dharmafarer.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/16.7-Anicca-Cakkhu-S-s25.1-piya.pdf


fb170508 piya


1 May 2023








Monday, 14 November 2022

SEARCHING SUTTAS, DOING DHAMMA

SEARCHING SUTTAS, DOING DHAMMA


With a growing number of scholars who are experts in Pali, and with more and better translations of the Pali texts, we have today more people than ever, not just Buddhists, but anyone interested in Buddhism, who know the suttas much better than the modern monastics of the world. 

My point is that it is not just a matter of reading and knowing the suttas, but “searching” and living the suttas, so that we walk the path of awakening.


PROFESSIONALS

As in any written texts, even sacred text or scripture, they can be and often are misused by the clever and the cunning. This problem takes a rather insidious turn in local Buddhism. For many “professional” teachers, teaching the suttas seems to be merely an extension of their profession. 

In other words, the fact that they have some kind of professionalism, academic qualification or social status is sufficient as qualification or entitlement to speak on the suttas or anything Buddhist.


ANYONE WHO CAN SPEAK

Here is a real-life story. A Buddhist temple once invited a respectable professional because he seemed to have shown some interest in Buddhism. He spoke to a crowded hall of respectfully attentive audience. His talk, however, was highlighted by the belief in God and the eternity of the Soul! 

Finally, a concerned Buddhist stood up and told the speaker that Buddhists neither subscribe to any God-idea nor believe in an eternal Soul. “Oh, I’m sorry,” at least he apologised, “but I am a Christian; I believe in God and the Soul!”


LAUGH REFLEX

This is clearly embarrassing and plainly unwise. In some cases, we even have non-Buddhists who have been invited or accepted to run Buddhist social projects for years before anyone even suspected they were not Buddhists! 

On a more insidious level, we should question ourselves how well we have understood, not to mention live and love, the suttas to speak so expertly on any of them, and to present them like some secular coffee-table subject to joke about. 

Some local Buddhists, it seems, have reflexively laugh whenever they hear  Buddhism which is different from the way they think. Humour is sometimes defined as coping with the incongruous!


FAKE TEACHINGS

When we are observant and concerned enough, we may wonder why some Sinhalese monks and their local followers speak of “transfer of merits,” as if good karma is some negotiable thing we can pass on to the dead (whether they can have it or not). No such teaching is found in any sutta. Perhaps, they wishfully equate this with “transfer of foreign currency” that have actually benefitted them since they came here.

Then, we righteously and loudly claim that we support LGBTQ rights, mainly because it is a “cool” thing to do: it gives us populist mileage; it attracts wealth. Are we then exploiting sex? 

Have we seriously examined or discussed the sutta teachings on sexuality, sexual identity and sexual morals? 

Are monastics experts in these areas? Here’s a catch-22: if they do, why are they monastics?; if they don’t, why are they monastics? 

The point is that monastics need not pretend to know everything; they must certainly know the Buddha Dhamma. What's the point of having a PhD or a lot of money when we cannot end suffering or reach the path in this life? Have we no faith in the the Dhamma?


ENDING SUFFERING

Let me not mention the sinister misquoting of the suttas—fake quotes—to promote racist ideas, social intolerance and religious violence amongst some quarters of ethnic Buddhists. The point here is vital and simple: we need “interpretive competence.” We must constanty ask how do we apply the Dhamma to our life.

It is not a matter of coming up with a different meditation or a new way of teaching Dhamma. 

We must competently present the suttas—only for explaining “suffering” and “ending suffering,” as the Buddha declares in the Anurādha Sutta (S 22.86), SD 21.13. This we must do well--with our life, with our love.


FEEL THE DHAMMA

The emphasis here is not merely on the act of “reading” or even “studying” the suttas (though these may have their own merits). It is about diligently “searching the suttas.” 

The suttas are unlike other religious texts where the FIAT lies in the words. When we see the words of the suttas, we are FREED from our self, from self-delusion. We can FEEL the Dhamma, directly know the Dhamma, we then really see the Buddha. 


BETTER HUMAN

The suttas are a vital record of the Buddha’s SELF-AWAKENING and those lives of the great saints of his time. These are an eye-opening adventure for us, with our eyes wide open to new and better possibilities of being human. 

And when we CLOSE our eyes, we SEE more of our heart and FREE our own divine qualities of love, ruth, joy and peace. The message of the suttas is that the path has been cleared again by the Buddha. He urges us to go on our journey from here to that path of awakening, and on to time-free nirvana.


MASTERING DHAMMA

Like going on any long journey, we need to be properly equipped to search the suttas—we need to master, at least, love language and literature—so that we understand the significance and nuances of the texts, and live the Buddha-word in our lives. 

A musician must be able to read notes or at least be diligent in practising on his musical instrument to be competent and skilful players. Even then, not every musician is able to present the full potential of a piece of music.


GOOD MUSIC

Good music calls for more than just knowing how to play an instrument, or even playing a piece well. The experience is richer when we understand music theory, playing techniques, and the life behind the composition. 

Then, our enjoyment of that music will be far richer and rewarding. This is not to say that a good musician must be disciplined and diligent in order to engage music at its deepest and highest levels.


SUTTA BACKGROUND

So it is with reading the suttas. The more we know about these earliest records we have of the Buddha’s life and teachings, the better we appreciate them. The more we know about their social, cultural and political environment, about their literary and rhetorical texture, and about our own self-conscious reading of these living words, the more likely we are to enter into meaningful dialogue with the suttas, so that we can fully, creatively, and responsibly grasp and give their intended sense and significance. 

We understand the text; we appreciate the context.


DOING DHAMMA

“Doing Dhamma” is different from talking Buddhism. Buddhism is secondary to living the DHAMMA. Buddhism is our often less-than-human exploitation of the Buddha’s teachings. The Dhamma is our desire to learn and discover ourself; to train our mind; to brighten and free our heart; to see and walk the path of awakening. All this requires honesty, courage, diligence and competence.

The one purpose of the SUTTA DISCOVERY (SD) translations with its modern commentaries is, hopefully, to create awareness of the truth and beauty of the Dhamma and respond to them wholesomely. 

To do this, we need to cultivate insight and skill in relevant areas, and to experiment with interpretive reading strategies so that we understand the suttas, so that we live and love them. 

This can be done alone, but it is more fruitful when done together with others, and with the friendly guidance of a facilitator who has well searched and is still joyfully searching the suttas


fb190801 piya

Bro Piya Tan


20th November, 2022




Sunday, 26 December 2021

How Buddhists should enjoy life ~ by Piya Tan

 🟠 MINDFUL CHRISTMAS

How Buddhists should enjoy life
~ by Piya Tan


CHRISTMAS is the most exciting holiday of the year for many, if not, most, western and westernized Buddhists, especially the wealthy and leisurely. The Christmas Buddhists. 

Today, the Christmas tree and presents decorate the houses of Christmas celebrants. 

After centuries of cultural and colonial conditioning, we cannot fail to feel the cheer of the season

The early Christians did not celebrate Christmas, just as the early Buddhists did not celebrate Vesak. No one knew the exact date of Christ’s birth while the Buddhists are more certain of the Buddha’s birthday. 

🟠 WINTER SOLSTICE

25 December was the date of the winter solstice in the Roman calendar. Westerners in the northern hemisphere celebrated the “return” of the sun from its journey south to welcome back warmth and fruitfulness. The churches were practically empty during this festival. 

What better way than to convert 25 December into a Christian festival to draw in the crowd.

It was nearly 400 years after Christ that Christmas was introduced by the Church Father, John Chrysostom, in Constantinople in 378. St Augustine explained that it was significant to take Christ as being born on the shortest day of the year, and grew up as the days grew longer with increasing light.

🟠 THE SUN

To Buddhists, the Buddha is the “kinsman of the sun” (ādicca,bandhu). In Dhamma terms, just as there is only one sun, the Buddha is our one and only true teacher. He gives us a meaningful life through the 4 noble truths, in the light of life’s true purpose, to awaken, like the sun awakening us daily.

Christmas is celebrated by most Christians, but not all Christians: just as most Buddhists do not celebrate Vesak, and most of us do not even know which day of the year it is. Many people get drunk during the Christmas season, but are more likely to remain sobre for the rest of the year. Many Buddhists tend to spend the years in a drunken stupor, hunting and gathering what wealth and worldliness they can. Then, maybe, they spend Vesak day not doing so, perhaps taking some vegetarian dish for a good feeling and filling.

🟠 CHRISTMAS TREE, BODHI TREE

The Christmas tree started in mediaeval times in Livonia (modern Estonia and Latvia), and was then adopted by the upper class in Germany, in the late 19th century. 

However, it was said that Martin Luther was the first to have a Christmas tree outside his Alsatian home. The tree (a fir, spruce or pine) was decorated with “roses made of colored paper, apples, wafers, tinsel, sweetmeats," recorded a chronicle in Strasbourg in 1604.

The Catholics had long resisted the German Lutheran Christmas tree. The Vatican Christmas tree stood for the first time in Vatican City in 1982.

🟠 WE LOVE TREES

Most Buddhists love trees. The Buddha was born under a sal tree, first meditated (at 7 years old) under a jambul tree, left home and lived amongst trees, most of the suttas were taught under some tree; and the Buddha passed away majestically under the twin sal trees. Hence, we at once engage with the Christmas tree as a religious symbol of life and light. 

As Buddhists, we, of course, see it in a Buddhist way.

A celebration is, as a rule, a celebration of lights. So it is with Christmas and with Vesak. 

In the darkness of our lives we are always drawn to such lights. The mindfulness of light (āloka,saññā) is a healthy exercise in early Buddhism; so is the mindfulness of space (ākāsa,saññā). 

Most Buddhists would be attracted to the lights of any festival: where there is light, there is also good food and good cheer.

🟠 BUDDHIST RENEWAL DAY

More serious Buddhists (like my wife and myself) see 25th December as Buddhist renewal day, spent in quiet reflection with some sutta or exchanging joyful Dhamma messages with students and friends. On this shortest day of the year (in the northern hemisphere), we reflect how short our human life is, how precious. 

This is our opportunity to be happy in the light of the sun of truth, and seek our way to the path of freedom.

It is a holy day to us. For those who keep the precepts, everyday is a holy day. The holidays, in the other hand, are days we spend bringing light and space of happiness to others. For us, Christmas and Vesak are not just a day in our lives. It is everyday of our life. When we wake, we rejoice in living and learning the Dhamma from our daily lives. Then, we rest our bodies to renew itself for the next day, closer to the path.

🟠 UNIVERSAL VALUES

The Buddha, in his wisdom, gave us the 5 precepts, since we value life, happiness, freedom, truth and wisdom. Hence, we remind ourself not to take life, not to take what is not ours, not to take advantage of others, not to take others for granted (by being untrue), and not to lose our wits. This is what being a Buddhist is basically about.

Christmas day, of all days, is one day we should remind ourselves of these 5 values that make our lives meaningful and purposeful. We cannot take our human state for granted. We often forget this; then, we break the precepts. 

It’s only human that we should keep the precepts; then, we do not fall into any subhuman state blinded in greed, hate and delusion.

Have a Mindful Christmas.

Be a better Buddhist. 

Happy Dhamma Renewal Day.



Sunday, 5 September 2021

Open Awareness and Open Mindfulness.

Dear friends,

Here’s sharing an article by Bro Piya Tan where he shares his understanding of the terms Open Awareness and Open Mindfulness, his experience on the application of the meditation techniques taught by Āyasma Aggacitta and his appreciation of the teachings of Āyasma Aggacitta.

OPEN AWARENESS, OPEN MINDFULNESS

Malaysian Buddhist Meditation that works

One of the signs of a living religion is that it renews itself. Buddhism is renewed locally by Āyasma AGGACITTA (the one with the foremost mind), a Malaysian Theravāda forest monk of Burmese training. 

His usage of Āyasma translates as “venerable,” better than Bhante, usually rendered “Sir,” a common mode of addressing seniors for both the laity and the monastic. Understandably, Aggacitta prefers being addressed as Āyasma so that we remember him as a monk, which is deeply admirable.

Recently, Aggacitta has introduced new terms during his ongoing teachings on Buddhist Dhamma and meditation, that is, the terms, OPEN AWARENESS and OPEN MINDFULNESS. The most remarkable aspect of these terms is that they are very simple yet effective meditation techniques, especially helpful for the beginner, also for advanced meditators when they have any kind of difficulties in their practice, and mental healing for those who need it.


ALWAYS AWARE

Firstly, OPEN AWARENESS (OA) simply refers the “present-moment” state of our being, that is, ongoing workings of the 5 physical senses and the mind. Whether we know it or not, our 6 senses (the 5 physical senses and the mind) are always seeking and processing their relevant sense-objects, even as we read this. 

In fact, even when we are asleep, our senses are still capable of sensing.

Here, let me venture to say (as I understand the suttas and myself) that, during sleep, the MIND is not aware of the physical sense-activities or “sensations.” However, it may still be aware of itself: that is why we dream. The mind, too, may fall asleep, become unaware of itself (like during deep dreamless sleep or when we are unconscious). This is when the subconscious or bhav’aṅga (the life-continuum) takes over. 

Otherwise, we are dead, since it has been reborn into a new existence.


BEING PRESENT

The most beneficial part is what we do with OPEN MINDFULNESS (OM), which is where Aggacitta’s years as a meditation practitioner guided by strict Vinaya observance has blessed us with his genius of a remarkably simple yet effective meditation technique.  OM is, simply, being present, here and now, with whatever we are SENSING (the 5 physical senses) or MINDING (the mind).

Understandably, we cannot humanly Be MINDFUL of all the 6 sense-activities or “sensations,” even if and when they are actually occurring, say, even now as we are reading this reflection. We can only choose ONE of these sensations, any one, especially the most dominant one.


ENGAGING

For example, right now, as I write this, my attention is on the letters and words appearing on the computer screen. I watch them, as each of them magically appear onscreen. I am also aware of the soft gentle clicks of my mechanical keyboard. That, too, sounds interestingly engaging. 

Occasionally, I notice my thoughts. But they are too fast for me to perceive transforming themselves through my body (arm, fingers, etc) knowing which key to hit at some speed into this reflection. In short, I am enjoying what I am doing.


 TIKKI’S CALL

Then, my cat, Tikki, will meow at me, which usually means she wants some water. When she paws me (touches me with her paw), it means she is really hungry. Here I am writing this important reflection or working on a translation.

Let me say that the thought “What an annoying cat!” never arises. Instead, I hear the words: “Compassion break!” 

Compassion for myself, too, that is, since I need a break from looking at the screen too long, from sitting too long. I answer Tikki’s call.


OPEN AWARENESS YOGA

Similarly, when I do my senior yoga, which combines Buddha Namaskar (a buddhified form of Suriya Namaskar) and half a dozen other postures (asana) to exercise all my limbs, especially by neck and lower back). 

I  will hold each stage of a posture to 

2 recitations of “namo tassa bhagavato arahato sammāsambuddhassa,” totalling 

3 rounds.

This yoga also helps me exercise with Open Mindfulness. When I think I have forgotten the 2nd round (dutiyam pi) I will do that round “again.” This exercise also keeps me in tandem with my bodily postures. 

I do this every day before the sun sets, also as a kind of Buddha Puja. This is my own understanding and practice of Open Mindfulness.


AGGACITTA’S TEACHING

Aggacitta tells us in his excellent talks—well presented with graphics, slides and snippets of relevant teachings, making it all fun to watch—that he spontaneously came up with the idea of differentiating between Open Awareness and Open Mindfulness. 

From my own understanding of what I have watched of Aggacitta’s teaching videos, I can say that Open Awareness simply refers to the “CONTACT” of sense-faculty, sense-object and sense-consciousness.

He teaches us that what we experience is an OBJECT (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch, thought). 

How we react or respond to this experience—whether we see it as pleasant on unpleasant—is the SUBJECT. “Neutral feeling” is usually only known through inference (we will not discuss this to keep this simple.)


IS THIS TAUGHT BY THE BUDDHA?

Aggacitta explains how he searched the suttas to see if his ideas are sutta-based. Happily, we see their roots in at least 2 well known and important teachings, that is,

(1) The Maluṅkya teaching (S 35.95) and the Bahiya teaching (U 1.10):

“In the seen, there is only the seen; in the heard, only the heard … .” (SD 5.9; SD 33.7).

(2) The Bhadd’eka,ratta Sutta series (M 131-134), where we find this famous verse and teaching:

Let one not pursue the past | nor hold fond hope for the future.

For, the past is gone, | and the future has not yet come.

Only the present state | (as it arises) one sees that with insight (tattha tattha vipassati).

(M 131, SD 8.9)


SEE WITH INSIGHT

Aggacitta has not mentioned any canonical Pali equivalents for “Open Awareness” or “Open Mindfulness.” 

However, from the suttas quoted above, we may conclude that the Pali for the action behind Open Awareness is PHASSATI (“touches” in terms of sense-contact or stimulus), and behind Open Mindfulness is VIPASSATI (see clearly, with insight), from which we get the noun VIPASSANĀ.

Aggacitta’s remarkably simple and effective meditation techniques, I predict, will create a new tidal wave in modern meditation, for which we must credit him, also because he has diligently been living as a Dhamma-Vinaya monk, which is very rare today, free of titles and other worldly burdens. He does Malaysian Buddhists (who follow the historical Buddha), and his Burmese teachers and friends proud.

Surely, we may envision him as a Malaysian Mahasi (MM) Sayadaw.

When I first met Aggacitta some 4 decades ago, he was a young reticent monk. We have grown significantly older: we have to continue his Dhamma teachings.

At least, we now have less excuse to complain about difficulties in meditation.


Sadhu.


fb210624 ©piya


********


This is an edited video of the online event Sunday Afternoon with Āyasmā Aggacitta held on 21 February 2021 where Āyasmā began by explaining why he changed open awareness to open mindfulness. The event is a live Q&A session where yogis can discuss their practices with Āyasmā. It is a spin-off from the online Mindful Awareness & Serenity Retreat organised by Sāsanārakkha Buddhist Sanctuary in November 2020.

Here's the link for the video: 

https://youtu.be/3Q1lFZ7DBtA



Thursday, 14 November 2019

BEYOND RELIGION (Part 1 to 3) by Bro Piya Tan

BEYOND RELIGION 

(Part 1 of 3)

We are heading that way, we must


Let us provisionally and broadly define RELIGION as “a belief in a reality that is above or other than the self.” "Belief" means that this is a private experience; "reality" means it can be either what we project (a virtual reality) or what is true in itself (true reality). "Above" means gaining a greater power in a good sense. "Other than the self" means it is rooted in our present being but can and should be more than just that.
Such as religion, or aspects or forms of it, have  been with us for over 100,000 years. It exists today in every culture, with nearly 90% of the world’s population holding some kind of religious belief.
.
THE MIND IS NOT JUST THE BRAIN

The mind scientists of our time generally think that religion is a BYPRODUCT of the way our brain works. Buddhism, however, does not teach that THE MIND is located anywhere, least of all the brain. The brain may function like the computer motherboard, but it must be connected with a screen/s (a monitor), some kind of “mouse,” power supply, other components, and, of course, software. 
All of this working together makes it possible for me to write this piece and see what I am doing. The mind, then, is not just the body: it is the total working of all our senses: the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body and the mind. Buddhists call these the “6 sense-bases.” The mind, so to speak, is behind all our sensing, including thinking. The mind can know itself (reflexive consciousness): this is a vitally important teaching in early Buddhism.


SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS
We have REFLEXIVE CONSCIOUSNESS:


we notice our self, or conceive of "ourself"; we notice patterns within ourself and in the world outside: this is called learning or “intelligence,” if you like. 
We connect A with B: when A occurs, B results. A is the cause, B is the effect. When this patterned thinking develops in “linear” progression: A causes B, which causes C … D, etc, then, we REASON that “A” must be the First Cause. We name this First Cause GOD, each culture has its name for this First Cause. We create our God who creates us. This is the way most religions, God-based beliefs, go.


CYCLES

Traditional Asian religions, especially the Indian belief systems notices something else. They see that the sun rises every morning from the same direction, the east (unlike in the northern hemisphere). Then, they notice the seasons, mostly a season of warmth, of rains, and of coolness. Again, the northern hemisphere cultures experience the seasons more drastically, facing summer, autumn or fall, winter, and spring. 
Either way, there is the seasonal cycle. Traditional Asian religions see the linear pattern as a part of a bigger cycle.  There is the cycle of the sun—sunrise, sunset—we call this DAY. Then, we notice the cycle of the moon—the lunar MONTH. There, are seasons, that is, a YEAR. Then, we notice the stars, and speculate beyond the year. There must be a greater cycle of time.


TIME: LINEAR AND CYCLIC

The point of this account is that in traditional Asian religions, time is not seen as linear, but as CYCLIC: it goes around and comes back. It’s like the face of the clock: times goes round and around. Time has no beginning, no end. Hence, Asian religions tend to have a richer variety of Gods, gods, other beings, spiritual spaces; and how our world came into being, without a First Cause. We call this SAMSARA (saṁsāra).
We have so far spoken of the “big picture,” a MACROCOSMIC view of religion. On a smaller or more personal level of religion, the MICROCOSMIC, we try, at some point (such as when there is a birth, a death, a great disaster, or some inexplicable event), to reason why things happen. We often end up concluding: “Everything happens for a reason.”


REASONING IS HUMAN 

Young children, for example, tend to believe that even trivial aspects of the natural world were created with a purpose (for a reason). In a series of studies by Boston University psychologist, Deborah Keleman, noted that when children are asked why a group of rocks are pointy, for example, they say something like, “It’s so that animals won’t sit on them and break them.” If you ask them why rivers exist, they say it’s so we can go fishing. 
We grow with this tendency to reason, coming up with more sophisticated reasons as we move on, but they are mostly our own views, our reflexes from past conditionings.
What these children (which we often still are) have been expressing are VIEWS, that is, conditioned responses: we see things that way, or we have heard it from other children (young and old), or we just hope so.  Of course, as we grow older, we realize how sweetly wrong we were, and know better, often enough.


INTENTION

Early Buddhism wants us to examine this “reasoning” more carefully. We will then notice that it is rooted in the way we think. They are not REALLY what or how things are: we made it all up. This is what is called DELUSION. It may be sweetly childish or we can be very serious about it. Either way, we have created our own world, in which we live and die.
We tend to feel GOOD (kind, loving, generous) when we accept others in our self-created world. The Buddha identifies this kind of thinking as “wholesome intention.” Or, we feel BAD (nasty, angry, selfish) against those who reason differently. This is “unwholesome intention.” 
How we THINK, our intention, decides how well we can get along with others, with the world, how we live or die, what happens or not thereafter. In early Buddhism, this kind of wholesome intentional living is called MORAL CONDUCT (sīla).


fb191112 piya



@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@



BEYOND RELIGION 

(Part 2 of 3)

Knowing, taming and freeing the mind



PURPOSE

The Buddhist life begins with moral training: understanding the basic nature of our body and mind. Our first or basic purpose is to MINDFULLY restrain our body so that we can exist and grow with others. Our mind gives us this MORAL PURPOSE which allows a good society to exist.

Not all other religions see moral purpose as being in our own mind or heart, as being WITHIN ourself. Most religions tend to see that purpose coming from OUTSIDE of us, from some external agency, which they usually call GOD or some universal essence.

In important ways, they believe that we have no choice but to be an instrument of that God-given purpose. The Buddha rejects such a wrong view: we are our own refuge and saviour (Dh 160, 380).

MY GOD IS BEST?

There is a vital difference between these two ways of religious or purposeful thinking. In the God-system, “man proposes, God disposes.” We are ultimately responsible only to God, or more specifically, OUR God.  Often enough, we conceive such a God as being all-loving, at least to us, at some strategic time.

One serious disadvantage with this way of religious thinking is that we do not feel accountable for any bad, harm or violence we show others, especially to those who do not follow OUR God. In fact, some even feel it their sacred duty to remove or exterminate such aberrations and distractions.

This has been at the root of religious wars for centuries, killing millions of innocent lives, even amongst the most civilized of us, especially so because we have better weapons of mass destruction to defend our faith. Such was Europe's 30 Years' War (1618-1648) between the Catholic Christians and Protestant Christians; 8 million people died as a result.
[See picture below.]

KARMA & MIND

Early Buddhism teaches karma, intentional action which arises in our own minds. It is not always easy to have GOOD intentions, especially in the face of pains that arise from outside of us, from others, as we see it. However, teaches the Buddha, with moral training, we can prevent NEGATIVE intentions arise that make our lives unwholesome.

Moral intention, at its best, allows us to live and let live. This is, in fact, what moral living basically means. To instill higher quality in such living, we need to CULTIVATE THE MIND, since our intentions arise from there. The mind tends to see mostly causes and effects [Part 1]. We need to use our HEART to arouse positive emotions so that by our example, our life and those of others, too, are MORE THAN HUMAN: we become divine, supremely good.

NOT GOD, BUT GODLINESS

All religions have some idea of the “divine life.” For most, this comes after death; or this can arise now if and only if we belong to the same TRIBE with its own building or space for prayer and faith. In this Tribal system of religion, moral conduct and purpose are defined by those who are “above” us or more powerful.

Although such authority are claimed from to come some Holy Scriptures, these are merely words, or The Word, which need to be interpreted by those who speak for God, that is, the most powerful amongst us.

The Buddha rejects such a God-centred class-structured I-Thou tribal religion as being too “inward looking,” self-centred, even Self-propelled. He rejects the idea of any kind of eternal Self or Other (some kind of universal essence) as being purely imaginative, exploitative and destructive. We can see all these negativities in religion, even today.

THE DIVINE LIFE

Rejecting a tribal, self-centred, after-death idea of DIVINITY, the Buddha teaches the divinity of goodness and awakening HERE AND NOW. The best and highest kind of God we can and should conceive is that of pure Love, Ruth,* Joy and Peace, goodness at all levels, in all its forms. Since these are qualities, Godliness if you like, we can and must all cultivate them.

*[RUTH is Middle English for compassion, but only "ruthless" is used today. It's good to bring back the good side of this beautful word.]

RUTH

LOVE is the unconditional acceptance of all life, all that lives. We begin by accepting people just as they are. Then, we notice they are lacking in some ways. We understand that when we lack love, we fall into bad ways, and tend to see what we lack as pain and punishment.

We should show them RUTH, compassion. We should be kind to them, give them a helping hand to  stand on their own, whether they deserve it or not. Ruth breed ruth.

JOY

To coexist with other beings, we must feel and show JOY, peace, above all, good, towards them. Rejoicing in their goodness, we feel good; then, we are good, too. Good, then, is an active way of seeing and acting beyond the self that limits our minds and darkens religion.

Yet, despite all our efforts and goodness, so much of the world still fall into pain and suffering. We alone can never completely remove the world’s suffering. We begin to understand that this is the way of the world, a cyclic reality of opposites: joy and pain, good and bad. We are at peace with that. In that peace, that cycle does not exist, that is, for as long that there is that peace.


fb191113 ©piya


https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/researchers-catalogue-grisly-deaths-soldiers-thirty-years-war-180963531/




@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@



BEYOND RELIGION 

(Part 3 of 3)
Religionless Buddhism, social awakening, individuation



[Before reading this, which is Part 3 of the set, it is good to start with Part 1; the Part 2. Anyway, you can still start here if you can’t wait. Then, you should start reading it as Parts 1-2-3 for the full good effect of this especially important reflection on Buddhism as self-effort.]


HEART OF THE MIND

Early Buddhism places great emphasis on calming the heart and clearing the mind—this is called MEDITATION. It can be defined as a family of mental exercises that make new or renew connections in the brain that regulates and refines attention and emotion, bettering how we see and feel ourself and the world. In important ways, these are measurable, hence, scientific ways of describing what essentially occurs in our body and being as a whole.

Properly done, meditation frees our attention from our self-centred projective attitude, creating and affirming the world in our own image. We are, truly, authors of our fate. Like any author, we tend to see what we have written as a brilliant masterpiece, that is, is good, indeed, the best. That is, until we stop to look more closely at our own work—reading the proof.

PROOFING OUR OWN WORK

When we carefully read our own works (not to mention those of others), we often see errors of typos, bad grammar, even of facts, so on. This is an essential act of SELF-DETERMINATION. Hence, the Buddha calls this the 1st noble truth: seeing unsatisfactoriness. It makes us noble, rising above our selfish burden, to have a better view of ourself.

Since we know WHAT went wrong in our writing, we now work on WHY or HOW they are wrong. Know this, we are wiser in righting those wrongs. We do this until the whole work has been REVISED and error-free, a work of truth and beauty. We then see our work, our mind and heart to have expressed what is a JOY forever, and we move along this path of inner freedom.

LIVING LESSONS

Early Buddhism training, then, not only makes us see ourself as we really are, but to carefully and joyfully read our SELF, how we see ourself, without fear or favour. We are a work in progress, a unique masterpiece in the making. What is wrong means it needs to be righted; what is right means upright; a right mind, an upright heart, have no fear, no anxiety; only a wish to grow, to rise above and beyond the fettered self.

This life of TRUTH AND BEAUTY, of joyful reality, fruits in a longer, healthier, more creative life. We have become TRUE INDIVIDUALS, free from the Tribe and its selfish God, above the Crowd and its destructive ways. Such individuals living together become a wholesome and productive SOCIETY, a world interconnected by love, ruth, joy and peace; a moral community of angels without wings; we have no need of wings, since we can just fly on a mere thought.

LIVING FULLY

In this religion-free world, we naturally live by 5 principles.
Harm no one, nor self, nor others, nor Nature.
Work respectfully, diligently, fruitfully, putting people above profit.
Play joyfully, charging life and light into our partner, family, community.
Look up to the common good of truth and goodness.
Live pure in mind, radiant of heart, a beautiful life of true freedom.

This no mere wishful fancy nor pious dribble. We can see aspects of this futuristic community even now, for example, in Denmark’s large welfare state, its social ethic of hard work and its strong dedication to political freedom and individuality. Such a human-centred society will only work and last when it is rooted in the transhuman qualities or divine values of love, ruth, joy and peace. It has to be religion-free; freed from the extremes of Guru and God.

HEAVEN HERE AND NOW

No amount of dialogue, no tolerance, no understanding can free religion from its divisive habits and demeaning of this world. It is a crowded slave-market where Gurus and God-sellers turn and twist our minds into their foolish, fearful and violent purposes, creating hell here and now, and hereafter.

The moral community, on the other hand, enjoys all the wholesome aspects of religion free of its nasty thorns and toxins. It is a our gathering of individuals so that we can, alone and together, truly work for the greater good, understanding that the best is yet to come but surely will be.


fb191113b ©piya


Saturday, 26 October 2019

Here are some tips to help the near and dear to deal with the grief of loss.

TO THE DEAR GRIEVING
Lessening the pain and learning from it


.
Here are some tips to help the near and dear to deal with the grief of loss.

.
1. Don’t just say (or don’t say): “Anything I can do, please … ” or something similar.
Offer to do something real and tangible. “Can I come over for a coffee?” or “Can I bring you anything from the supermarket?”

.
2. Be prepared to deal with a muddled mind.
The grieving person often needs help making decisions, but help gently. Clarity of whatever you’re offering is imperative. Simply just deciding a meeting place and time for that promised coffee should be enough. Be a little more patient with the grieving than usual.

.
3. Anything can put the grieving on an emotional downward spiral.
Often, however, talking about the lost beloved brings the most peace to the grieving—yet it's the one thing most people avoid talking about.

.
4. Watch out for any triggers.
Often the grieving has triggers associated with death. For some, it is ambulances or sirens; for others, it may be a photo. These are neither eggshells we should skirt around nor should we baby the grieving. This helps us understand any sudden change of emotion or conduct in the grieving  in the face of the trigger.

.
5. Listen when the grieving tells you of a change in behaviour or in the way they cope.
And listen intently. Read between the lines. Meet up for a cup of tea and talk about it. They may be trying to tell you they're going downhill and need a shoulder, without wanting to appear weak.

.
6. Understand that they CAN function quite normally, too.
Often enough, we somehow manage our grief and get on with our life. It’s just that there may be occasions when some powerful images or memories overwhelm us. This is where we should be prepared to apply the coping skills we have learned, or contact someone we can turn to in such times.

.
7. Tears.

When the grieving cries, it’s normal to feel awkward. Pass him the tissues. Hold his hand.  Quietly listen. It’s a valuable human experience which helps us understand the nature of grief and loss.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

One of the biggest false statements we often make is to say “Time heals.” We just LEARN to cope and live with it. One of the worst pressures is to think that by a certain date, we should be healed.

Time may blunt or lessen the sting, but for the griever, it’s can be a prison sentence without parole. There seem to be no light at the end of the tunnel. We just have to get up each morning and hope something gives us a glimmer that gets us through the day.

That glimmer for some is the warm presence of family, good friends, new friends, and the small things we have done along the way. One day, we, the grieving, will repay the warm hands of kindness shown to us, when, sadly, their time comes for them to walk down the same road.

.
SKY LANTERNS

For the 100th day memorial, a great idea would be for the immediate family to float SKY LANTERNS as a gesture of love and closure. This is best done in an open space away from an  airport, air base, or when planes are flying above. Before lighting the lanterns, someone or everyone may say some reflective words for the dearly departed. The lanterns are then lit and floated up with a feeling of love and well wishes.

A sky lantern, also known as “Kong Ming Lantern,” “Wish Lantern,” or simply "Chinese lantern," is an airborne paper lantern which derives buoyancy through heated air enclosed within the body of the lantern. Heat is usually generated through a small flame housed within the lantern. Sky lanterns are commonly released during Chinese New Year and Mid Autumn Festival.

How to make a SKY LANTERN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHyAefvWpXA. 

In Singapore, before releasing sky lanterns, we should be aware of some rules regarding it:

https://www.caas.gov.sg/public-passengers/aerial-activities/release-of-sky-lanterns

.
fb191026 piya

Wednesday, 23 October 2019

GAME RULES by Bro Piya Tan

GAME RULES by Bro Piya Tan


.
Imagine when we have no access to the suttas; we don’t even know that they exist. Then, we have no way of knowing what exactly the Buddha and the early arhats taught. We will be completely ignorant of the Buddha Dhamma.

Even worse, we will be blindly follow the numerous Teachers, Gurus and Talkers of Buddhism today. With only our views and biases acting like a lightning rod in a dark sky clouded by the thunder and lightning (the Teachers, Gurus and Talkers), they will just zap into our lightning conductors and electrify our lives.

.
PROPERLY GROUNDED

Sadly, we have not grounded our lightning-rods in the earth that holds the Bodhi tree. So we are electrified and stunned by the enticing and inspiring Teachings of the Teachers, Gurus and Talkers. We think we have found the only true Guru and hid Teaching. We place him even above the Buddha, since we do not even know the Buddha.

We will be quarrelling with one another or hate one another because we are Buddhists!
These are Cult Buddhisms.

.
DHAMMA SEEKERS

Dhamma teachers, monastic or lay, are only human. They sometimes promote themselves without knowing it, or we think they are promoting themselves. When we behave like their servants and slaves, we only encourage them to treat us so. We should all be Dhamma-seekers. At the right time, we should point out the wrong things they are doing or teaching; we should remind them of the Vinaya (many of the Vinaya rules were introduced because of complaints from the laity). These are our duties as lay followers.

If they are truly good monastics, they will listen to us and respect us. And we listen to them and respect them. This mutual respect is like a “social contract.” The monastic almsbowl represents the “bond” between the monastics and the laity.

The monastics live in Vinaya and Dhamma, and teach the laity by example, and the laity support them respectfully. It is for this reason, true monastics do not need money: they are RENUNCIANTS, working for awakening in this life itself.
.
KIND AND RIGHT

We will be foolish to think that it is better to be “kind” rather than “right.” We may then think of this as an excuse to accept wrong conduct and false teachings as being “all right.” It is only proper to be both KIND AND RIGHT. This is the Buddha’s wisdom (right) and compassion (kind) which we should follow.

The suttas are our gold standard and quality control. They teach us how to live our lay lives properly and happily so that we can reach the path in this life itself, even as lay followers. The Vinaya protects the monastics from worldly distraction, and keeps the laity safe from false or weak monastics

The suttas, then, are the most ancient and true RELICS we still have today, going back, at least in spirit, to the Buddha himself. When we seek the suttas we learn to practise the true teachings of the Buddha no matter where we are. Temples and centres that love and respect the suttas become the protectors of suttas to propagate the Buddha Dhamma to benefit countless people.

.
RULES DEFINE THE GAME

A teaching is true not because a teacher says so, but because it is found in the suttas. We properly understand the suttas through our own practice of moral virtue, mental cultivation and wisdom, even on a simple level.

When we know nothing about the suttas, then, we will be ignorant and helpless. When we don’t understand the Vinaya, it’s like not knowing the rules of a game. Football is not football without its rules. What is Buddhism then?

,
fb191020 piya



Wednesday, 11 September 2019

WINKS OF WISDOM By Bro Piya

WINKS OF WISDOM


.
Sometimes, I wonder if, since the Buddha’s passing, we are still mourning his death so that we keep looking for a lost teacher, a power-figure or some kind of fetish to fill up our hollowness of not understanding the most basic of the Buddha’s teaching: impermanence.

Hence, we can see post-Buddha Buddhism as a gradual, sometimes sudden, degeneration of religion and spirituality. This retrograde seems dramatically real when we, for example, compare Buddhism with the evolution of western philosophy. Let’s see, just for the fun of it.

.
THE ANCIENT GREEKS

Let’s conveniently begin with THE ANCIENT GREEKS (some spell it without the R). They had so much time—small city-states, relaxed dress code, and slaves—hence, they have a lot of time for philosophy, the love for wisdom, but which is often also a lust for thinking. This reminds us for modern Buddhist monastic life: our own retreat centres, a status-stating uniform, assured of life’s needs, including salaried slaves (buddha,dāsa).

SOCRATES, the greatest of the Greek philosophers, can be represented by his famous maxim: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” This is a good place to start because for most of us, who dislike examinations or any kind of test. We may end up seeing life in 3-D (decay, disease and death): that’s what happened to the Buddha!

Socrates’ importance is noted by the term “Pre-Socratics,” those Greek thinkers who came before him. They thought about the nature of existence (metaphysics). Are all things composed of “earth-like” matter (the Materialists), or of water (Thales), or air maybe (Anaximenes), or fire surely (Heraclitus), or even “space” (Anaximander)? The Buddha knew better: it’s all these and more.

.
ATOMS AND WHEELS

The Greek thinkers, especially Democritus, developed the idea that all reality is composed of tiny, indivisible, indestructible an ATOM. The brahmins thought this was bigger—as big as existence itself—and called it ATMAN (notice the close but false resemblance). The Buddha split the atom long before Rutherford: No atom, declares!

PLATO, who, in some ways, gave us the Socrates we know today, is the most studied of the Greek philosophers. This is like Nagarjuna, who many of us regard as the Creator of the Buddha, and who turned the Dharma Wheel the 2nd, 3rd or 4th time. The wobbly wheel must have often stopped for them.

.
ARISTOTLE AND TWOS

Almost as famous as Plato was his pupil, ARISTOTLE, and Alexander’s teacher. He came up with the binary idea: it is either good or bad, black or white, and so on. This made possible our binary cybernetics and the computer that we are right now slaving at. The Buddha accepted the Indian logical quadrilemma—a thing is or is not, or both is and is not, or neither is nor is not. (I need to read this again.)  This is mind-boggling, and a mathematics friend told me this wordy idea would destroy all the modern mathematics we know today, and society as we know it.

Then, there were the SOPHISTS (like Protagoras and Gorgias): there is no absolute truth, and two different views and coexist. They were probably the first Zen-like itinerant intellectuals who taught rhetoric and virtue for money. Sounds like our modern Vihara priesthood.

.
BEFORE THE DARKNESS

The NEO-PLATONISTS influenced almost all that defined Western civilization, including its main religion. Augustine of Hippo (not the water-elephant) was strongly influenced by the idea of an ineffable and transcendent One, from which the rest of the universe emanates: sounds like Buddhist docetism, which has all the Buddhas, except, it seems, Gotama, and no arhats allowed.

Then came the DARK AGES (beginning around the 4th-5th centuries. This was a time when reading was understandably difficult. Whatever light there was seemed to be in the royal palaces and the Church. They read their Scripture in Latin (like Sanskrit). Peasants (those who lived outside palaces and monasteries) were not allowed to read Scripture, but only listen to it. We Buddhists have more freedom: we can choose not to read and who to listen to (as long as it’s not about suttas).

.
RENAISSANCE

The Renaissance brought back Greek philosophy which the westerners seemed to have forgotten about in their age of darkness. Ironically, the great Muslim scholars had preserved these precious teachings which were translated into western languages.

This is like the founding of the Pali Text Society and our university Buddhist courses today. Our best monastics are schooled there to become venerable doctors of Buddhism. Doctored Buddhism is in high demand in our urban society that measures everything,

.
BUDDHIST THEOLOGY

“Buddhist Theology” appeared in 2000 and has prospered ever since. Everyone Dharma preacher is (must be) an accomplished Theologian. We are blessed to choose the best and canonize them as Arhats or Bodhisattvas.

Not all Theologians are bad, of course. There was ROBER BACON, who actually criticized the Scholastic system (what we call here Abhidharma), and rejected tradition and scriptural authority. Another Empiricist was the Elizabethan FRANCIS BACON. This was the start of EMPIRICISM: it’s lovely to think that the scientific method started with Bacon.

.
BACON AND REASON

Bacon did not seem to go well with vegetarians, Buddhist or otherwise. Tradition and authority, with or without scripture, is necessary for religious to prosper. Buddhist scholars and scholasts (mostly) are amongst society’s most prosperous today; otherwise, we can always work with a more lucrative faculty. We don’t need to be Buddhist to teach Buddhism. Being Buddhist is such a biased profession.

Then, came the Age of Reason (17th century) and the Age of Enlightenment (18th century), but we will examine them another time, after we have recovered from our fits of laughter or fitful wrath at such impiety. But please remember, even this short note took millennia to prepare. Please do not dismiss it lightly or otherwise.

.
fb190912 piya





Friday, 6 September 2019

BUDDHA SAYS, I SAY By Bro Piya Tan

BUDDHA SAYS, I SAY


.
A kind, intelligent and creative monk I once knew wrote that his purpose was to make a translation that is first and foremost readable, so that this astonishing work of ancient spiritual insight might enjoy the wider audience it so richly deserves. I say “I once knew” because we have stopped communicating, out of the embarrassment of a growing number of differing views we have about early Buddhism.

After a few years of knowing him and, and some reading and listening to his well publicized works in cyberspace, I realized that he actually disagreed with my understanding that the suttas actually teach us, in so many ways, that we must work for STREAMWINNING in this life itself. I clearly recall years back when I excitedly but calmly shared with him this happy discovery, he coldly, almost gruffly but characteristically, dismissed it: “The Buddha seems to make it all so easy!”

.
FAILING FAITH

My faith in him was deep enough to take his words LITERALLY: yes, the Buddha, indeed, makes it all so easy for us! This is just what we should be doing. However, after a few years, I realized that my faith had failed me. He really meant just the opposite: he was forbearingly facetious, hinting that I had violated one of his verified dogmas: that we must have jhana even to attain streamwinning. Yet I cannot find any reference in the suttas for this.

I was being paltry. But he did not or dared not say that I was wrong (but I certainly was to him). One thing is clear: he has proven how dense and slow my mind worked when trying to read his subtexts. We were talking but there was no communication at all!

.
THE BUDDHA SAYS

Now, how would the Buddha respond when approached? Would he have been archaic and obscure? Would he use words in odd, alienating ways? Would we need to have an expert by our side, whispering notes into our ear every second sentence—“He said this; but what he really meant was … ”? That just what it seemed to have been when we chatted all these years!

On a higher, less personal level—correction: the higher the level, the more personal it becomes. The most personal connection we can today have with the Dhamma is to start with the suttas: in Pali or in translation. The suttas are the coded programmes the Buddha left us as our guide. We need to run them as they are, like any computer programme; then, they will work their wonder.

.
BUDDHIST HYBRID ENGLISH

Ideally, he claims, an approachable translation expresses the meaning of the text in simple, friendly, idiomatic English. It should not just be technically correct, it should sound like something someone might actually say. Which means that it should strive to dispense entirely with the abomination of Buddhist Hybrid English (BHE), that obscure dialect of formalisms, technicalities, and Indic idioms that has dominated Buddhist translations, into which English has been coerced by translators who were writing for Indologists, linguists, and Buddhist philosophers. I disagree!

Firstly, we should not look down on BHE. It is the natural language of both the scholars on high, whose careful learning drops on us like the gentle rain from heaven. It is twice blest: it blesses the scholars who live for learning, and those on the ground who learn for living. If not for the scholars, we would not have such easy access to the Pali editions, translations, and modern commentaries we have today.

.
THE WAY WE ARE

“Buddhist Hybrid English” was a condescending term invented by an elitist scholar who apparently laughed at the starts and stutters of his students and squints (non-scholars), and then left for a better-paying job. So what if the Burmese translated Pali texts using “uncomfortable English”; the Sinhalese, too, rarely, if ever, spelled roman Pali correctly; and the Thai Pali texts are so inaccessible. We should help them; not mock them with a thousand papercuts.

Bring any volume of the best English translation of the Pali texts today. Nay, get a thousand copies, or as many as there are people in a talk by a populist speaker. Get the venerable speaker to ask his audience to read these sacred translations. Now, time them: we will see how quickly its obscurity distances readers, pushed away by the density of the printed page.

.
GUIDANCE NEEDED

Even the best translations need an inspired and inspiring teacher to guide us through them. These translations are like musical notes to be properly play, without missing a note, and to be respectfully heard to be enjoyed. Of course, we can teach individuals to play a passage or an excerpt, feel its truth and beauty. The Dhamma is to be heard, felt and lived.

That is how those who listened to the Buddha would have experienced it. They were never rightly being annoyed by the grit of dubious diction, nor were they being constantly nagged to check the footnotes. Yet, they know: just as they humbly bow at the Buddha’s feet, they respect these footnotes, that the scholars and teachers took hours, even days, to put together to guide the lost and uncloud the perplexed.

.
MARA DISCOURAGES

As we study and live the suttas, we are drawn inwards and upwards, fully experiencing the Dhamma’s transformative power as it echoes in our own understanding. Even a firefly of understanding pierces brightly the dark night of samsaric ignorance.

How easily then we can repeat this experience: this is the secret to the path. Repetition is diligence, and yet it is different each time. “Repetition” is a word Māra uses to discourage us. The reality is that we never repeat the Dhamma: we live it but once, and then it’s gone. Every moment counts; each step we take uplifts. To take a new step, we first ift up one foot, put it down; then, the other foot rises up even higher.

.
WRITING SUTRAS

At each step of the way we ask myself, “Would an ordinary person, with little or no understanding of Buddhism, be able to read this and understand what it is actually saying?” Our compassion wells up for them who look at Dhamma but see not. Even the simplest words are just coloured marks on colourless paper. This is called ignorance.

We can create a new translation with simpler words rather than the more complex; with direct phrasing rather than the oblique; with the active voice rather than the passive; with the informal rather than the formal; with the explicit rather than the implicit. What we have done is merely written our own Sutras, like those churned out in the centuries after the Buddha. If suttas could be simplified, then, the scholars would be awakened beings by class and course.

When we remove the lines that hold the musical notes together, what are we left with? The line that holds the suttas together goes back to the Buddha himself—but only when we free the words, we see the line. For that, we need to take the suttas just as they are, and get to know them, starting now. As we mature, so will our understanding—but having a good teacher only expedites the clarity of our mind and openness of our hearts. Still, we must take the steps ourself.

,

fb190906 piya

Thursday, 1 August 2019

SEARCHING SUTTAS, DOING DHAMMA - Piya Tan

SEARCHING SUTTAS, DOING DHAMMA

With a growing number of scholars who are experts in Pali, and with more and better translations of the Pali texts, we have today more people than ever, not just Buddhists, but anyone interested in Buddhism, who know the suttas much better than the modern monastics of the world.

My point is that it is not just a matter of reading and knowing the suttas, but “searching” and living the suttas, so that we walk the path of awakening.

.
PROFESSIONALS

As in any written texts, even sacred text or scripture, they can be and often are misused by the clever and the cunning. This problem takes a rather insidious turn in local Buddhism. For many “professional” teachers, teaching the suttas seems to be merely an extension of their profession.

In other words, the fact that they have some kind of professionalism, academic qualification or social status is sufficient as qualification or entitlement to speak on the suttas or anything Buddhist.

.
ANYONE WHO CAN SPEAK

Here is a real-life story. A Buddhist temple once invited a respectable professional because he seemed to have shown some interest in Buddhism. He spoke to a crowded hall of respectfully attentive audience. His talk, however, was highlighted by the belief in God and the eternity of the Soul!

Finally, a concerned Buddhist stood up and told the speaker that Buddhists neither subscribe to any God-idea nor believe in an eternal Soul. “Oh, I’m sorry,” at least he apologised, “but I am a Christian; I believe in God and the Soul!”

.
LAUGH REFLEX

This is clearly embarrassing and plainly unwise. In some cases, we even have non-Buddhists who have been invited or accepted to run Buddhist social projects for years before anyone even suspected they were not Buddhists!

On a more insidious level, we should question ourselves how well we have understood, not to mention live and love, the suttas to speak so expertly on any of them, and to present them like some secular coffee-table subject to joke about.

Some local Buddhists, it seems, have reflexively laugh whenever they hear  Buddhism which is different from the way they think. Humour is sometimes defined as coping with the incongruous!

.
FAKE TEACHINGS

When we are observant and concerned enough, we may wonder why some Sinhalese monks and their local followers speak of “transfer of merits,” as if good karma is some negotiable thing we can pass on to the dead (whether they can have it or not). No such teaching is found in any sutta. Perhaps, they wishfully equate this with “transfer of foreign currency” that have actually benefitted them since they came here.

Then, we righteously and loudly claim that we support LGBTQ rights, mainly because it is a “cool” thing to do: it gives us populist mileage; it attracts wealth. Are we then exploiting sex? Have we seriously examined or discussed the sutta teachings on sexuality, sexual identity and sexual morals?

Are monastics experts in these areas? Here’s a catch-22: if they do, why are they monastics?; if they don’t, why are they monastics?

The point is that monastics need not pretend to know everything; they must certainly know the Buddha Dhamma. What's the point of having a PhD or a lot of money when we cannot end suffering or reach the path in this life? Have we no faith in the the Dhamma?

.
ENDING SUFFERING

Let me not mention the sinister misquoting of the suttas—fake quotes—to promote racist ideas, social intolerance and religious violence amongst some quarters of ethnic Buddhists. The point here is vital and simple: we need “interpretive competence.” We must constanty ask how do we apply the Dhamma to our life.

It is not a matter of coming up with a different meditation or a new way of teaching Dhamma. We must competently present the suttas—only for explaining “suffering” and “ending suffering,” as the Buddha declares in the Anurādha Sutta (S 22.86), SD 21.13. This we must do well--with our life, with our love.

FEEL THE DHAMMA

The emphasis here is not merely on the act of “reading” or even “studying” the suttas (though these may have their own merits). It is about diligently “searching the suttas.”

The suttas are unlike other religious texts where the FIAT lies in the words. When we see the words of the suttas, we are FREED from our self, from self-delusion. We can FEEL the Dhamma, directly know the Dhamma, we then really see the Buddha.

.
BETTER HUMAN

The suttas are a vital record of the Buddha’s SELF-AWAKENING and those lives of the great saints of his time. These are an eye-opening adventure for us, with our eyes wide open to new and better possibilities of being human.

And when we CLOSE our eyes, we SEE more of our heart and FREE our own divine qualities of love, ruth, joy and peace. The message of the suttas is that the path has been cleared again by the Buddha. He urges us to go on our journey from here to that path of awakening, and on to time-free nirvana.

MASTERING DHAMMA

Like going on any long journey, we need to be properly equipped to search the suttas—we need to master, at least, love language and literature—so that we understand the significance and nuances of the texts, and live the Buddha-word in our lives.

A musician must be able to read notes or at least be diligent in practising on his musical instrument to be competent and skilful players. Even then, not every musician is able to present the full potential of a piece of music.

.
GOOD MUSIC

Good music calls for more than just knowing how to play an instrument, or even playing a piece well. The experience is richer when we understand music theory, playing techniques, and the life behind the composition.

Then, our enjoyment of that music will be far richer and rewarding. This is not to say that a good musician must be disciplined and diligent in order to engage music at its deepest and highest levels.

.
SUTTA BACKGROUND

So it is with reading the suttas. The more we know about these earliest records we have of the Buddha’s life and teachings, the better we appreciate them. The more we know about their social, cultural and political environment, about their literary and rhetorical texture, and about our own self-conscious reading of these living words, the more likely we are to enter into meaningful dialogue with the suttas, so that we can fully, creatively, and responsibly grasp and give their intended sense and significance.

We understand the text; we appreciate the context.

.
DOING DHAMMA

“Doing Dhamma” is different from talking Buddhism. Buddhism is secondary to living the DHAMMA. Buddhism is our often less-than-human exploitation of the Buddha’s teachings. The Dhamma is our desire to learn and discover ourself; to train our mind; to brighten and free our heart; to see and walk the path of awakening. All this requires honesty, courage, diligence and competence.

The one purpose of the SUTTA DISCOVERY (SD) translations with its modern commentaries is, hopefully, to create awareness of the truth and beauty of the Dhamma and respond to them wholesomely. To do this, we need to cultivate insight and skill in relevant areas, and to experiment with interpretive reading strategies so that we understand the suttas, so that we live and love them.

This can be done alone, but it is more fruitful when done together with others, and with the friendly guidance of a facilitator who has well searched and is still joyfully searching the suttas

.
fb190801 piya

Thursday, 26 October 2017

WHO SEES DHARMA SEE ME - Piya Tan

TAILS OF FAIRIES
[From Section 2.3.1.4 of Āsaṁsa Bhikkhu Sutta (A 3.13), SD 51.128]
.

WHO SEES DHARMA SEE ME


The early Buddhist sense of DHAMMA, KĀYA is that the Buddha, after he has awakened, is ontologically—his state of being in philosophical terms—in the light of non-self, as a person (the teacher), is identical with the Dharma (the teaching and truth). In early Buddhism, this simply means that, even after the Buddha’s death, he can be “seen” in the form of the teaching (dhamma).
Hence, it is famously said in the Vakkali Sutta (S 22.87):

“He who sees the Dharma sees me; he who sees me sees the Dharma”

(yo kho vakkalī dhammaṁ passati maṁ passati, yo maṁ passati dhammaṁ passati),

Here, “sees” means both knowing and understanding buddhahood, leading to self-transformation and awakening.

AWAKENING IS NOT A "THING"

In Mahāyāna and later Buddhism, however, the dharma, kaya (Sanskrit) is considered to be the sameas perfect enlightenment (sambodhi), primordially or eternally existent, transcending all perceptual forms or signless (animitta), and hence impossible to perceive. Amongst its qualities (guṇa) are freedom from all conceptualization (nirvikalpa), liberation from all defilements, and the intrinsic ability to act.

In later forms of Indian and Tibetan Buddhism, under the influence of Tantric thought, the Dharma-kāya is considered to be equivalent to the Buddha-mind. Philosophically, then, where the suttas teach that the after-death state of the Buddha or any arhat cannot be described in any way (exist, not exist, both, neither), later Buddhism hypostatized even such an apophatic (negative language) statement [3]—made it into a “reality” or “thing.”

The serious disadvantage of this is that it is still a view. In early Buddhism, any kind of view is a plank in the eye that blinds us from seeing true reality. Plank,” a wordplay on “a long narrow flat piece of wood” and “a main point in the policy of an organization, esp a political party.” (Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary).

I, ROBOT

We can imagine RELIGION to be like a robotics class. We are taught how to make robots. So we create a most beautiful looking humanoid, fully limbed and featured, of just the right colours and proportions, clothed just right. It is even able to talk and reply intelligently to us—so it seems. And we fall in love in with it—we even worship it since it seems far better than we are. Are we human or are we robot now?

This is called THE PYGMALION EFFECT, named after the Greek myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with a statue of Galatea he has carved. In our own times, this is also called the Rosenthal effect, a situation where a teacher’s expectation shapes his students, for example, his higher expectations lead to an increase in performance. Broadly, we can say a student becomes what his teacher wants him to be—what is he, then? (Notice how difficult it is to get this when we think we already know EXACTLY what all this means.)

fb171026 piya